ChatGPT en Ciencias Sociales: revisión de la literatura sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial (IA) de OpenAI en investigación cualitativa y cuantitativa

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2024.e18a04

Palabras clave:

Inteligencia artificial, ChatGPT, Metodologías de investigación, Revisión sistemática, Métodos cualitativos, Métodos cuantitativos, OpenAI, IA

Resumen

Esta nota examina el impacto de la inteligencia artificial (IA), particularmente el modelo ChatGPT, en las investigaciones sobre Ciencias Sociales. Para ello, se lleva a cabo una revisión sistemática exploratoria identificando los principales artículos académicos publicados en 2023 sobre el chatbot de OpenAI y, más concretamente, sobre su uso en métodos de investigación. Los resultados confirman la existencia de tres tipos de conjuntos temáticos: (1) estudios sobre ChatGPT y educación; (2) estudios sobre el uso del chatbot como apoyo a la investigación; (3) investigaciones sobre ChatGPT, información y salud. Este trabajo concluye reconociendo la importancia de una integración responsable de la IA en las prácticas de investigación científica, enfatizando la colaboración humano-máquina y el pensamiento crítico como mecanismos de supervisión necesarios.

Citas

Adams, Donnie; Chuah, Kee-Man; Devadason, Edward; Azzis, Muhammad-Shamshinor-Abdul (2023). “From novice to navigator: Students’ academic help-seeking behaviour, readiness, and perceived usefulness of ChatGPT in learning”. Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12427-8

Alanzi, Turki M. (2023). “Impact of Chatgpt on teleconsultants in healthcare: perceptions of healthcare experts in Saudi Arabia”. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, n. 16, pp. 2309–2321. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S419847

Allehyani, Sabha-Hakim; Algamdi, Mohammed-Abdullah (2023). “Digital competences: Early childhood teachers’ beliefs and perceptions of ChatGPT application in teaching English as a Second Language (ESL)”. International journal of learning, teaching and educational research, v. 22, n. 11, pp. 343-363. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.18

Alqasham, Fahd-Hamad (2023). ChatGPT in the Saudi EFL classroom: A study of learner usage patterns and possibilities in learning optimization. Migration letters, v. 20, n. S7, pp. 1251-1263. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS7.4828

Alshami, Ahmad; Elsayed, Moustafa; Ali, Eslam; Eltoukhy, Abdelrahman E. E.; Zayed, Tarek (2023). “Harnessing the power of ChatGPT for automating systematic review process: Methodology, case study, limitations, and future directions”. Systems, v. 11, n. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11070351

Al-Shboul, Mohammad-Khaled-Issa; Alwreikat, Asma; Alotaibi, Faiz-Abdullah (2023). “Investigating the use of ChatGpt as a novel method for seeking health information: A qualitative approach”. Science & technology libraries, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2023.2250835

Burger, Bastian; Kanbach, Dominik; Kraus, Sascha; Breier, Matthias; Corvello, Vincenzo (2023). “On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research”. European journal of innovation management, v. 26. n. 7, pp. 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0156

Codina, Lluís; Lopezosa, Carlos; Freixa, Pere (2022). “Scoping reviews en trabajos académicos en comunicación: frameworks y fuentes”. En: Larrondo-Ureta, Ainara; Meso-Ayerdi, Koldo; Peña-Fernández, Simón (eds.). Información y Big Data en el sistema híbrido de medios-XIII Congreso Internacional de Ciberperiodismo. 15-17 nov 2021; País Vasco. [Leioa]: Universidad del País Vasco; pp. 67-85 Universidad del País Vasco. http://hdl.handle.net/10230/53155

Cox, Rachel; Hunt, Karen; Hill, Rebecca (2023). “Comparative analysis of NCLEX-RN questions: A duel between ChatGPT and human expertise”. Journal of nursing education, v. 62, n. 12, pp. 679-687. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20231006-07

Chubb, Laura-Ann (2023). “Me and the machines: Possibilities and pitfalls of using artificial intelligence for qualitative data analysis”. International journal of qualitative methods, v. 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231193593

Chung, Eric M.; Zhang, Samuel C.; Nguyen, Anthony T.; Atkins, Katelyn M.; Sandler, Howard M.; Kamrava, Mitchell (2023). “Feasibility and acceptability of ChatGPT generated radiology report summaries for cancer patients”. Digital Health, v. 2023, n. 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231221620

Dengel, Andreas; Gehrlein, Rupert; Fernes, David; Görlich, Sebastian; Maurer, Jonas; Pham, Hai; Großmann, Gabriel; Eisermann, Niklas (2023). “Qualitative research methods for large language models: Conducting semi-structured interviews with ChatGPT and BARD on Computer Science Education”. Informatics, v. 10, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10040078

D’Oria, Marika (2023). “Can AI language models improve human sciences research? A phenomenological analysis and future directions”. Encyclopaideia, v. 27, n. 66, pp. 77-92. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/16554

ElSayary, Areej (2023). “An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era”. Journal of computer assisted learning, v. 2023, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12926ELSAYARY15

Esmaeil, Ahmad-Azmi-Abdelhamid; Matanluk, Ovelyn-Oy; Marshall, Sanen (2023). “Understanding student perception regarding the use of ChatGPT in their argumentative writing: A qualitative inquiry”. Jurnal komunikasi: Malaysian journal of communication jilid, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 150-165. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3904-08

Giannakopoulos, Kostis; Kavadella, Argyro; Aaqel-Salim, Anas; Stamatopoulos, Vassilis; Kaklamanos, Eleftherios (2023). “Evaluation of the performance of generative AI large language models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in supporting evidence-based dentistry: Comparative mixed methods study”. Journal of medical internet research, v. 25, e51580. https://doi.org/10.2196/51580

Gilson, Aidan; Safranek, Conrad; Huang, Thomas; Socrates, Vimig; Chi, Ling; Taylor, Richard; Chartash, David (2023). “How does ChatGPT perform on the United States medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment”. JMIR medical education, v. 9, n. 1, e45312. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312

Gil de Zúñiga, Homero; Goyanes, Manuel; Durotoye, Timilehin (2023). “A scholarly definition of artificial intelligence (AI): advancing AI as a conceptual framework in communication research”. Political communication, v. 41, n. 2, pp. 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2290497

Hamilton, Leah; Elliott, Desha; Quick, Aaron; Smith, Simone; Choplin, Victoria (2023). “Exploring the use of AI in qualitative analysis: A comparative study of guaranteed income data”. International journal of qualitative methods, v. 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406923120150

Jangjarat, Kris; Kraiwanit, Tanpat; Limna, Pongsakorn; Sonsuphap, Rattaphong (2023). “Public perceptions towards ChatGPT as the robot-assistant”. Online journal of communication and media technologies, v. 13, n. 3, e202337. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4480718

Khlaif, Zuheir; Mousa, Allam; Hattab, Muayad; Itmazi, Jamil; Hassan, Amjad; Sanmugam, Mageswaran; Ayyoub, AbdulKarem (2023) “The potential and concerns of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: The case of ChatGPT”. JMIR medical education, v. 9. http://doi.org/10.2196/47049

Kim, Pyoung-Won (2023). “A framework to overcome the dark side of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) like ChatGPT in social media and education”. IEEE transactions on computational social systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3315237

Morgan, David L. (2023). “Exploring the use of artificial intelligence for qualitative data analysis: The case of ChatGPT”. International journal of qualitative methods, v. 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248

Mukred, Muaadh; Asma’mokhtar, Umi; Hawash, Burkan (2023). “Exploring the acceptance of ChatGPT as a learning tool among academicians: A qualitative study”. Jurnal komunikasi: Malaysian journal of communication Jilid, v. 39, n. 4, pp. 306-323. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3904-16

Niloy, Ahnaf; Akter, Salma; Sultana, Nayeema; Sultana, Jakia; Rahman, Sayed (2023). “Is Chatgpt a menace for creative writing ability? An experiment”. Journal of computer assisted learning, v. 2023, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12929

Parker, Jessica L.; Richard, Veronica M.; Becker, Kimberly (2023). “Flexibility & iteration: Exploring the potential of large language models in developing and refining interview protocols”. The qualitative report, v. 28, n. 9, pp. 2772-2791. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6695

Parker, David; Mancini, Karen; Abram, Marissa (2023). “Natural language processing enhanced qualitative methods: An opportunity to improve health outcomes”. International journal of qualitative methods, v. 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406923121414

Preiksaitis, Carl; Rose, Christian (2023). “Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of generative artificial intelligence in medical education: scoping review”. JMIR medical education, v. 9, e48785. https://doi.org/10.2196/48785

Ruiz-Estrada, Mario; Park, Donghyun; Staniewski, Marcin (2023). “Artificial intelligence (AI) can change the way of doing policy modelling”. Journal of policy modeling, v. 45, n. 6, pp. 1099-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.11.005

Remoto, Jocelyn (2023). “ChatGPT and other AIs: Personal relief and limitations among mathematics-oriented learners”. Environment and social psychology, v. 9, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1911

Švab, Igor; Klemenc-Ketiš, Zalika; Zupanič, Saša (2023). “New challenges in scientific publications: Referencing, artificial intelligence and ChatGPT”. Slovenian journal of public health, v. 62, n. 3, pp. 109-112. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0015

Yun, Ji-Young; Kim, Dong-Jin; Lee, Nara; Kim, Eun-Key (2023). “A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT consultation quality for augmentation mammoplasty: A comparative analysis between plastic surgeons and laypersons”. International journal of medical informatics, v. 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105219

Villan, Fabiano; Santos, Renato P. (2023). “ChatGPT as Co-advisor in scientific initiation: Action research with project-based learning in elementary education”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14701. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.14701

Descargas

Publicado

2024-03-03

Cómo citar

Goyanes, M., & Lopezosa, C. (2024). ChatGPT en Ciencias Sociales: revisión de la literatura sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial (IA) de OpenAI en investigación cualitativa y cuantitativa. Anuario ThinkEPI, 18. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2024.e18a04

Número

Sección

Comunicación cientí­fica y evaluación de la investigación