OpenAlex. The grandeur and scars of a bibliographic Frankenstein
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2026.e20a12Keywords:
OpenAlex, Bibliometrics, Bibliographic databases, Metadata, Open accessAbstract
OpenAlex has established itself as the major open and free alternative to Web of Science and Scopus. Its vast coverage, however, contrasts with the fragility of its foundations. On the one hand, it exceeds 450 million records and offers greater linguistic, disciplinary, and geographical diversity. On the other, its automated and uncurated aggregation carries over poor metadata and thousands of potentially predatory journals. Drawing on this diagnosis, the article offers recommendations on when the database should be used and with what cautions.
References
Torres-Salinas, D., & Arroyo-Machado, W. (2026). Las Big Three de la información científica: revisión bibliométrica comparativa de Web of Science, Scopus y OpenAlex (Informe PLUGG01XX26, Versión 1.2). EC3metrics / InfluScience Ediciones. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18336510
Forchino, M. V., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2026). The OpenAlex database in review: Evaluating its applications, capabilities, and limitations. Journal of Informetrics, 20, 101800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101800
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Dimensions