OpenAlex. The grandeur and scars of a bibliographic Frankenstein

Authors

  • Daniel Torres-Salinas University of Granada image/svg+xml
  • Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado INGENIO (CSIC-UPV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2026.e20a12

Keywords:

OpenAlex, Bibliometrics, Bibliographic databases, Metadata, Open access

Abstract

OpenAlex has established itself as the major open and free alternative to Web of Science and Scopus. Its vast coverage, however, contrasts with the fragility of its foundations. On the one hand, it exceeds 450 million records and offers greater linguistic, disciplinary, and geographical diversity. On the other, its automated and uncurated aggregation carries over poor metadata and thousands of potentially predatory journals. Drawing on this diagnosis, the article offers recommendations on when the database should be used and with what cautions.

References

Torres-Salinas, D., & Arroyo-Machado, W. (2026). Las Big Three de la información científica: revisión bibliométrica comparativa de Web of Science, Scopus y OpenAlex (Informe PLUGG01XX26, Versión 1.2). EC3metrics / InfluScience Ediciones. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18336510

Forchino, M. V., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2026). The OpenAlex database in review: Evaluating its applications, capabilities, and limitations. Journal of Informetrics, 20, 101800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101800

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-11

How to Cite

Torres-Salinas, D., & Arroyo-Machado, W. (2026). OpenAlex. The grandeur and scars of a bibliographic Frankenstein. Anuario ThinkEPI, 20. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2026.e20a12

Dimensions

Societal impact


Issue

Section

Comunicación cientí­fica y evaluación de la investigación