A risky proposal: turning repositories into mega-journals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a29

Keywords:

Open access, Repositories, Scientific journals, Green model, Gold model, Repository as journal

Abstract

The aim of this communication is to consider the new problems that open-access models are posing for scholarly communication. Double charging, publishers with nonstandard practices, and biases associated with accessing the publishing market are some of the recent problems that the pay-to-publish model is producing. Taking these problems into account, this paper presents a proposal for combining the green and gold models, proposing a solution that could benefit the publishing system, separating it from the commercial sector. The article suggests the creation of journals through repositories, which would permit articles reviewed through open access, whose evaluation process would be supported by the same entities that fund them, to be published removed from commercial interests. The proposal is set out as a debatable idea that discusses the commercial nature of scientific publishing.

References

Aguillo, Isidro F. (2021). "Detergentes, cuñados y las revistas MDPI". Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 15, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2021.e15e03

Al-Khatib, Aceil; Teixeira-da-Silva, Jaime A. (2017). "Threats to the survival of the author-pays-journal to publish model". Publishing research quarterly, v. 33, n. 1, pp. 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9486-z

Aspesi, Claudio; Luong, Helen (2014). "Reed Elsevier: Goodbye to Berlin - The fading threat of open access (upgrade to market-perform)". Bernstein research, September 24. http://www.richardpoynder.co.uk/Aspesi.pdf

Bjí¶rk, Bo-Christer (2012). "The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment?". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 63, n. 8, pp. 1496-1504. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22709

Bosman, Jeroen; Frantsví¥g, Jan-Erik; Kramer, Bianca; Langlais, Pierre-Carl; Proudman, Vanessa (2021). The OA diamond journals study. Part 1: Findings. Science Europe. https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/22224

Cabezas-Clavijo, Álvaro; Milanés-Guisado, Yusnelkis; Delgado-Vázquez, Ángel M. (2022). "Methodological shortcomings of bibliometric papers published in the journal Sustainability (2019-2020)". En: 26th International conference on science and technology indicators, Granada, 7-9 septiembre. https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/13296

De-Castro, Pablo (2020). "Acuerdos "transformativos" con los editores: un controvertido paso adelante en la implantación del acceso abierto". Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 14. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2020.e14e03

Green, Toby (2017). "We´ve failed: Pirate black open access is trumping green and gold and we must change our approach". Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1116

Harnad, Stevan (1995). "Overture: The subversive proposal. En: Shumelda-Okerson, Anna; O´Donnell, James J. (eds.). Scholarly journals at the crossroads: A subversive proposal for electronic publishing. Association of Research Libraries, pp. 11-12. ISBN: 0918006260 https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015034923758&view=1up&seq=24

Larivií¨re, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie; Mongeon, Philippe (2015). "The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era". PloS one, v. 10, n. 6, e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Merton, Robert K. (1942). "Science and technology in a democratic order". Journal of legal and political sociology, v. 1, pp. 115-126.

Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason; Larivií¨re, Vincent; Alperin, Juan-Pablo; Matthias, Lisa; Norlander, Bree; Farley, Ashley; West, Jevin; Haustein, Stefanie (2018). "The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles". PeerJ, n. 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375

Rizor, Sara L.; Holley, Robert P. (2014). "Open access goals revisited: How green and gold open access are meeting (or not) their original goals". Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 45, n. 4, pp. 321-335. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.45.4.01

Watson, Clare (2022). "Rise of the preprint: How rapid data sharing during Covid-19 has changed science forever". Nature Medicine, v. 28, n. 1, pp. 2-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01654-6

Weber, Dana (2009). "Hybrid OA journals: A progression or a destination?". Open and libraries class journal, v. 1, n. 2. https://web.archive.org/web/20091214083433/http://infosherpas.com/ojs/index.php/openandlibraries/article/view/32/87

Wolfram, Dietmar; Wang, Peiling; Hembree, Adam; Park, Hyoungjoo (2020). "Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science". Scientometrics, v. 125, n. 2, pp. 1033-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03488-4

Zhang, Lin; Wei, Yahui; Huang, Ying; Sivertsen, Gunnar (2021). "What makes a journal questionable? An analysis using China´s early-warning list". SocArXiv 94v5m, Center for Open Science. http://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/94v5m

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Ortega, J.-L. (2022). A risky proposal: turning repositories into mega-journals. Anuario ThinkEPI, 16. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a29

Issue

Section

Comunicación cientí­fica y evaluación de la investigación