Assessment of the ethical use of ChatGPT in scientific research: Key trends, best practices, and identified challenges

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2024.e18a19

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Artificial intelligence, AI, Scientific research, Research ethics

Abstract

This research note explores the ethical implications of using generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the design and development of scientific research. Based on a systematic approach through a scoping review, we review major published studies on the intersection between ChatGPT generative AI and research ethics. The findings categorize the studies into three clusters: 1) the ethical use of ChatGPT in academic research, 2) the ethical use of ChatGPT in education and health, and 3) ChatGPT-related bias, equity, and regulation. Topics examined in this review include ethical concerns about AI-generated content, citation and authorship of AI-generated contributions, and the impact of ChatGPT on educational integrity and health care practices. The study concludes by reflecting on the need for the design of new ethical guidelines and human oversight to ensure responsible use of artificial intelligence, highlighting the importance of transparency, regulation, and ethical evaluations over time to limit the potential biases of this technology and the ethical dilemmas it will trigger.

References

Arjanto, Paul; Senduk, Fiebry F.W.; Nahdiyah, Umi; Utami, Mukti S. (2024). “AI and ethics in mental health: exploring the controversy over the use of ChatGPT”. Journal of public health, v. 46, n. 2, pp. e340-e341. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad254

Balmer, Andrew (2023). “A sociological conversation with ChatGPT about AI ethics, affect and reflexivity”. Sociology, v. 57, n. 5, pp. 1249-1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231169676

Barnhart, Andrew J.; Barnhart, Jo-Ellen M.; Dierickx, Kris (2023). “Why ChatGPT means communication ethics problems for Bioethics”. The American journal of bioethics, v. 23, n. 10, pp. 80-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2250278

Casal, J. Elliot; Kessler, Matt (2023). “Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing”. Research methods in applied linguistics, v. 2, n. 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100068

Cascella, Marco; Montomoli, Jonathan; Bellini, Valentina; Ottaiano, Alessandro; Santorsola, Mariachiara; Perri, Francesco; Sabbatino, Francesco; Vittori, Alessandro; Bignami, Elena-Giovanna (2023). “Writing the paper ‘Unveiling artificial intelligence: an insight into ethics and applications in anesthesia’ implementing the large language model ChatGPT: a qualitative study”. Journal of medical artificial intelligence, v. 6. https://doi.org/10.21037/jmai-23-13

Ferreira, Alana-Luna; Lipoff, Jules B. (2023). “The complex ethics of applying ChatGPT and language model artificial intelligence in dermatology”. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, v. 89, n. 4, pp. e157-e158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2023.05.054

Gil de Zúñiga, Homero; Goyanes, Manuel; Durotoye, Timilehin (2024). “A scholarly definition of artificial intelligence (AI): advancing AI as a conceptual framework in communication research”. Political communication, v. 41, n. 2, pp. 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2290497

Gottlieb, Michael; Kline, Jefrey A.; Schneider, Alexander J.; Coates, Wendy C. (2023). “ChatGPT and conversational artificial intelligence: Ethics in the eye of the beholder”. The American journal of emergency medicine, v. 70, n. 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.06.023

Goyanes, Manuel; Lopezosa, Carlos (2024). “ChatGPT en Ciencias Sociales: revisión de la literatura sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial (IA) de OpenAI en investigación cualitativa y cuantitativa”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 18, e18e04. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2024.e18a04

Graf, Akseli; Bernardi, Rick E. (2023). “ChatGPT in research: balancing ethics, transparency and advancement”. Neuroscience, v. 515, pp. 71-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.02.008

Grant, Maria J.; Booth, Andrew (2009). “A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies”. Health information & libraries journal, v. 26, n. 2, pp. 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Kahambing, Jan-Gresil; Zhao, J.; Fu, F. (2023). “ChatGPT, machine ethics, and conceptualizing Digital Dharma Therapy”. Ethics, medicine and public health, v. 30, 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100933

Khan, Mizanur R. R.; Habib, Showrab B.; Tasnim, Syeda T.; Islam, Ariful (2023). “Educational AI and ethical growth: Exploring the effects of ChatGPT on student learning strategies, critical thinking, and academic ethics from a Bangladeshi academic perspective”. In: 2023 26th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT60459.2023.10441564

Li, X. (2023) “Prospects and suggestions for the application of ChatGPT in medical ethics education”. Chinese medical ethics, v. 36, n. 10, pp. 1074–1078.

Lopezosa, Carlos; Díaz-Noci, Javier; Codina, Lluís (2020). Methodos. Anuario de Métodos de Investigación en Comunicación Social, 1. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. https://doi.org/10.31009/methodos.2020.i01.00

Lopezosa, Carlos (2023). “La Inteligencia Artificial generativa en la comunicación científica: retos y oportunidades”. Revista investigación e innovación en ciencias de la salud, v. 5, n. 1, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.211

Lund, Brady D.; Wang, Ting; Mannuru, Nishith-Reddy; Nie, Bing; Shimray, Somipam; Wang, Ziang (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence-written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 74, n. 5, pp. 570-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750

Meier, Lukas J. (2023). “ChatGPT’s responses to dilemmas in medical ethics: The devil is in the details”. The American journal of bioethics, v. 23, n. 10, pp. 63-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2250290

Park, Joo-Young (2023). “Could ChatGPT help you to write your next scientific paper?: concerns on research ethics related to usage of artificial intelligence tools”. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, v. 49, n. 3, 105. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.3.105

Pournaras, Evangelos (2023). “Science in the era of ChatGPT, large language models and generative AI”. KI-Kritik/AI Critique, v. 6, 275. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839467664-015

Rahimi, Farid; Abadi, Amin-Talebi-Bezmin (2023). “ChatGPT and publication ethics”. Archives of medical research, v. 54, n. 3, pp. 272-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.03.004

Rahimzadeh, Vasiliki; Kostick-Quenet, Kristin; Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer; McGuire, Amy L. (2023). “Ethics education for healthcare professionals in the era of ChatGPT and other large language models: Do we still need it?”. The American journal of bioethics, v. 23, n. 10, pp. 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2233358

Ray, Partha-Patrim (2023). “ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope”. Internet of things and cyber-physical systems, v. 3, n. 1, pp. 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003

Roy, Asitava-Deb; Das, Dipmala; Mondal, Himel (2024). “Efficacy of ChatGPT in solving attitude, ethics, and communication case scenario used for competency-based medical education in India: A case study”. Journal of education and health promotion, v. 13, n. 1, 22. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_625_23

Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (2023). “‘ChatGPT et al.’: The ethics of using (generative) artificial intelligence in research and science”. Journal of information technology, v. 38, n. 3, pp. 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231200411

Schulte, K (2023). “ChatGPT meets Ethics Council”. Innere medizin, v. 64, n. 6, pp. 562-562.

Shaw, David; Morfeld, Peter; Erren, Thomas (2023). “The (mis) use of ChatGPT in science and education: Turing, Djerassi,“athletics” & ethics”. EMBO reports, v. 24, n. 7, e57501. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202357501

Stahl, Bernd-Carsten; Eke, Damian (2024). “The ethics of ChatGPT–Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology”. International journal of information management, v. 74, 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102700

Vargas-Murillo, Alfonso-Renato; Pari-Bedoya, Inda-Nadia-Mónica-de-la-Asunción; Guevara-Soto, Francisco-de-Jesús (2023). “The ethics of AI assisted learning: A systematic literature review on the impacts of ChatGPT usage in education”. In: Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (pp. 8-13).

Vetter, Matthew A.; Lucia, Brent; Jiang, Jialei; Othman, Mahmoud (2024). “Towards a framework for local interrogation of AI ethics: A case study on text generators, academic integrity, and composing with ChatGPT”. Computers and composition, v. 71, 102831.

Published

2024-08-10

How to Cite

Lopezosa, C., & Goyanes, M. (2024). Assessment of the ethical use of ChatGPT in scientific research: Key trends, best practices, and identified challenges. Anuario ThinkEPI, 18. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2024.e18a19

Issue

Section

Comunicación cientí­fica y evaluación de la investigación