Recommendations to editors to strengthen the peer review process in their scientific journal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2016.44Keywords:
Academic journals, Peer review, Academic recognition, Reviewers trainingAbstract
This article provides an analysis of the critical aspects that editors must consider when managing the peer-review process. While the evaluators assure the quality of a journal, the editor(s) must take steps to improve the process with two main objectives: promoting academic recognition and establishing communication and training tools. In this paper the authors offer concrete recommendations for pursuing these objectives.Downloads
Published
2016-05-10
How to Cite
Rodríguez-Yunta, L., & Tejada-Artigas, C.-M. (2016). Recommendations to editors to strengthen the peer review process in their scientific journal. Anuario ThinkEPI, 10, 222–227. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2016.44
Issue
Section
E. Comunicación científica