The role of information professionals in interpreting the results of journal league lists for research performance evaluation
Keywords:
Journal evaluation, Journal league lists, Journal rankings, Citation databases, Inconsistencies, WoS, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, GS, Google Scholar Metrics for Publications, GSMP, Microsoft Academic Search, MAS, EPIAbstract
This paper discusses some of the key content and software features which must be analyzed by skilled librarians/information professionals to deliver reliable, accurate, and appropriately comprehensive set of bibliographic data and bibliometric indicators about the status of the journals listed in the promotion, tenure and grant applications, as well as in journal desiderata for purposes of collection development in academic and special libraries.
Downloads
Published
2013-10-01
How to Cite
Jacsó, P. (2013). The role of information professionals in interpreting the results of journal league lists for research performance evaluation. Anuario ThinkEPI, 7, 11–16. Retrieved from https://thinkepi.scimagoepi.com/index.php/ThinkEPI/article/view/30323
Issue
Section
Prólogo