Which open infrastructures?

Authors

  • Isidro F. Aguillo Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientí­ficas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2023.e17a21

Keywords:

Open Science, Open infrastructures, Research evaluation, Academic databases, Metrics

Abstract

There is a strong movement for radical reform of the scientific evaluation processes in accordance with the principles of the open science initiative. To support the new system, one or several open platforms specifically designed for evaluation purposes is badly needed. A brief critical evaluation of some of the services currently used or available is carried out, and it is concluded that, although they provide important content that can be reused, the services alone are not enough nor completely suitable for rigorous, reliable and transparent evaluation. A proposal for a new tool is introduced with a brief analysis of its feasibility, along with a description of the needs and characteristics it must comply with.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguillo, Isidro F. (2022a). "Mejores métricas para una mejor evaluación". Revista de la Sociedad Española de Bioquí­mica y Biologí­a Molecular, art. 781. https://revista.sebbm.es/articulo.php?id=781&url=mejores-metricas-para-una-mejor-evaluacion

Aguillo, Isidro F. (2022b). "Bibliometrí­a sofisticada" . Anuario ThinkEPI, n. 16. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16e28

CoARA (2022). Agreement on Reform of Research Assessment. https://coara.eu/app/uploads/2022/09/2022_07_19_rra_agreement_final.pdf

Published

2023-07-28

How to Cite

Aguillo, I. F. (2023). Which open infrastructures?. Anuario ThinkEPI, 17. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2023.e17a21

Dimensions

Altmetrics

Issue

Section

Comunicación cientí­fica y evaluación de la investigación